This article came from the Australian.
MIDWIVES have warned there are high rates of “unnecessary repeat caesarean sections” in Australia to support a new push for Medicare to pay midwives.
They are calling for a national policy to reduce or stabilise the rate of c-sections in Australia within five years and calling for private hospitals and health funds, which have much higher rates of intervention than public hospitals, to join the campaign.
The reform push is a strong theme of submissions to a major review of maternity services in Australia being conducted by the Rudd Government, that also suggests post-natal care is letting down new mothers and more support is needed to help women breasfeed their babies.
Midwives have also blamed the media for the rise of the “too posh to push” myth and promoting c-sections as a “lifestyle choice” and promoting the “false” notion that a caesarean section is as safe, or safer than, a normal birth.
Citing research that suggests 60 to 80 per cent of women with a previous caesarean birth can give birth vaginally, midwives have warned just 16 per cent of women have a vaginal birth after an earlier c-section.
But obstetricians have sounded a word of caution on a small but growing number of women who want to give birth at home and suggested one reason for increasing c-section rates is older and overweight mothers.
Don’t you just love how the obstetricians blame the women for the increasing rate of section. It couldn’t be anything to do with their practice. What a bunch of misogynists they are.
Health Minister Nicola Roxon has today released over 900 submissions to the Rudd Government’s Maternity Services Review including hundreds of submissions from Australian mothers on how to improve birth services in hospitals and at home.
“The majority are from individual consumers. Their personal accounts of experiences with maternity care sound a strong note of concern that our maternity system has become too focussed on medical intervention ,” Ms Roxon said.
Listen up Docs, the consumers are not happy, woman are getting the picture that the maternity system is focused on the medicalisation and not the woman her body and her baby.
A key recommendation of the review is expected to be an expanded role for midwives, including Medicare item numbers, which may allow them to commission blood tests or even ultrasounds without requiring clearance from a doctor.
There is an international definition of a midwife. Our role doesn’t need to be expanded just accepted. Fancy commissioning a blood test or ultrasound, next we will be wanting the vote.
Another suggestion is that Medicare should pay midwives, not just doctors, to care for pregnant women to reduce rising caesarean rates in Australia and private health insurance should even cover independent midwives to care for women who want to birth at home.
The Australian College of Midwives has raised concerns about rising caesarean rates and other interventions in labour including forceps and vacuum deliveries noting research that just one in five low risk women who birthed in a private hospital acheived a vaginal birth without intervention compared with 39 per cent of public patients.
“Social induction, which takes place when women are ‘sick of being pregnant’ is also too common. The flow on costs for the widespread use of interventions in labour are high – both for women and their babies who are exposed to the the risks of major surgery and recovering from it,” the submission states.
What about the social inductions that take place because the Ob has the weekend off? Or is going on holiday and hasn’t bothered to mention to the client before that at her actual due date that he will be away. This is far more common that the “sick of being pregnant” I’m sure that any woman told the risk of induction would really think twice about it.
But care for mothers after birth has also emerged as problem in the submissions with The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists suggesting this is one area where midwives could play and important role.
Righteo this sounds like hard work, lets get the midwives to follow it up, after all we have been paid a massive amount of money to provide continuity of care.
Doctors, midwives and breastfeeding experts should be offered direct Medicare funding to improve postnatal care in Australia to boost breastfeeding rates and reduce post-natal depression according to the nation’s obstetricians.
How about you don’t fuck up the birth process, that would significantly decrease the post natal depression rates. Once again the Obstetricians couldn’t possibly accept that it may be down to them in the first place. We know in nature that a hindered birth causes the mother to reject the baby. What makes us so very different is we internalise the process onto ourselves as we can’t just reject our off spring, and of course don’t want to.
“Inadequacies in post-natal care is a constant finding of all reviews of maternity services. Direct Medicare funding of all practitioners midwives, GPs lactation consultants, psychologists/psychiatrists should be introduced,” the RANZCOG submission states.
But obstetricians have also sounded a note of caution of rushing down the independent midwife path.
“Suggestions that independent midwives might care for women antenatally and in labour in the public system but as “effective private midifery patients is not supported,” obstretricians said, citing “interprofessional conduct.
Lets never give women informed choice, it would be very bad for our pockets.
The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare’s Report “Australia’s Mothers and Babies 2006″ released today confirms caesarean section births increased to 30.8 per cent in 2006 compared to the 2004 OECD average of 22 per cent of births.
However, the rate is even higher at private hospitals.
Dear Readers,
But it’s not the surgeons fault! Those shifty women and independent midwives are causing so much trouble. Interfering with our schedules, demanding what they want, expecting us to cater for their needs. It’s just not on. We are the experts here, we need to be revered. We only earn so much money because we are important. Women’s bodies and vagina’s are so dodgy that without us they are nothing.
Love the Obs
Anyway, lets hope that Nicola Roxon and the government are looking at the figures and listening to the women and not being lobbied by the AMA
Homebirth? Share this post with your friends


LMFAO!!!! you’re awesome Lisa!!!
Great post, Lisa. Hopefully they actually listen to the submissions and do something to positively reform the maternity services provided to Australian women.
Love the site Lisa, and the topics. Just my opinion though – maybe you could cut out the use of swear words? I know you’re passionate beyond belief, and frustrated by the majority of everyone else’s ignorance, but the second you use a swear word in an informative article, the validity goes straight down the drain. Even more important for people stumbling across your articles with open minds, and then to just be put off by an unnecessary swear word.
Thanks Lauren, I’ll keep that in mind. However I am aware that I write mainly for my own amusement as much as for information.
tigtog: I can attest that there are pently of doctors who believe they are far less likely to be sued for vaginal bypass surgery whatever the outcome than for allowing birth. And they’re not necessarily always all that far off the mark, I think: over the past decade or so, there’s been a pretty strong societal idea that babies die because of vaginal birth, but in spite of intervention. (Substitute homebirth and hospital birth for similar ideas.) It’s the we did all we could effect.
Yes we live in hope that Nicola Roxon and co do listen to WOMEN. – continue to keep everyone informed with your blog.
Wishing you all the best for the Festive Season Lisa and all the best for 2009
Same to you.xxx