Induction happens to 1 in 3 women in Australia. Why is it that we think that a third of all women are unable to give give without the medical help of Obstetric intervention?
The most common reason given is the “overdue” issue. We have gone from believing that term was 37 to 42 completed weeks where the edd was the 40th week (exact middle of the time we could be term) to using the estimated date as a gospel. If women are not birthed within a week of this estimate then the medical establishment, not known for their patience, feel the need to help out. They do it with the excuse that leaving the baby inside any longer is endangering it’s life. Logical thought would rule this out as nature has a way of sorting out every other animals birthing pattern so it would stand to reason as part of the animal kingdom we should also be left.
This not the case. Obstetricians are far superior to nature and must step in to the process whenever possible.
This appeared on the BBC News website today
‘Needless’ Birth Induction Fears
Concerns have been raised about pregnant women being induced “unnecessarily”, after a Scottish audit of 17,000 births.
In more than a quarter of cases, researchers could not find a medical or other explanation for the procedure.
The Aberdeen University team said in the Journal of Public Health that rates of obstetric intervention were rising.
Experts warned that more studies were needed to assess whether inductions are being done without good reason.
In the UK, the commonest method of induction is the use of a gel containing prostaglandins to bring on contractions and start the labour process.
Medical reasons for induction include being over 41 weeks pregnant, waters breaking but no onset of labour, or planned timing of labour because of complications.
The procedure is associated with an increased likelihood of further medical interventions, such as caesarean section.
Rates of induction are rising in the UK – particularly in Scotland – but there does not seem to be a single explanation for the figures, the researchers said.
Using data in the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal databank on births between 1999 and 2003, they identified that 5,700 or 32% of pregnant women had been induced.
Reasons for induction included the standard medical reasons as well as social factors such as living a long way from the hospital.
But 28% of cases remained unexplained.
Surprising
“I did expect to find a proportion that could not be explained because as good as the database is I’m sure there are characteristics that are just not collected, but we were slightly surprised that it was as high as it was,” said study leader Tracy Humphrey, consultant midwife at Grampian NHS Board.
“It raises the question that there may be some unnecessary interventions and we are planning further studies.”
She added: “The main debate about unnecessary interventions has focused on caesareans and we have forgotten about the other interventions that go on.”
Mary Newburn, head of policy research at the National Childbirth Trust, said that if a significant number of inductions were being done without cause, it was a serious problem which must be addressed.
“Further research is needed to identify the circumstances of induced labour where there are not good clinical reasons.”
She added that induced labour tends to be more painful and more difficult for women to manage without strong drugs.
“If women are asking for induction because they are tired at the end of pregnancy, they may need more support, and encouragement to rest as much as possible, so that they can wait a bit longer.”
Patrick O’ Brien, a consultant at University College London Hospitals and a spokesperson for the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said the finding was interesting but it may be that reasons for induction were not properly recorded in the database.
“But it is important that there is a good reason for inducing labour when it happens,” he added. “More research needs to be done.”
Sue Macdonald, spokeswoman for the Royal College of Midwives, said it was important that women knew why induction was being done.
“We are very interested in trying to support normal birth and ensuring an intervention is done only when it’s absolutely necessary.”
I can only agree with this and remind all women that birth is a normal and natural process. Don’t accept intervention especially when there is no reason.
Related posts:
Homebirth? Share this post with your friends

this is such a great post.
induction leads to so many complications. it is extremely frustrating to hear how many healthy pregnant women are induced because they are supposedly one week overdue. the obtertric model seems to focus on numbers instead of listening to the woman.
the more people that know and understand this, the better birthing experiences will be for women.
Hi Lisa your pal virginia from UK here. Just had to comment as induction is my bug bear I wrote an article about it which was published in Practising Midwife and is also on my web site. Feel free to put it on your blog if you want to. best wishes and good catching vxxxx
I’m with you on this one, Lisa. Have you seen the paper “Nonsensus Consensus” that was published in the British Med Journal by Philip Hall, M.D.
He talks about the bad science that led to the induction epidemic.
The other very telling study is the “First Births Project”. I think government action is needed on this one. The drs won’t do it by themselves, they are making too much money.
Gloria Lemay
http://www.glorialemay.com/blog
I hope you are OK.
I have nominated you for a Lemonade Award for bloggers with great attitude or gratitude. Youknow get to nominate ten (or so!) others and if you are able, even download te picture of the award which I haven’t yet managed *sigh*
Congrats!
Thanks Virginia, will use it for sure. Glad you are doing well. Fancy a homebirth retreat in Aus in May. I’d love to have you come over.
xxx